Brian Burke, who does some excellent analytical work at advancednflstats.com has made this observation regarding three first-year quarterbacks - Joe Flacco of Baltimore, Matt Ryan of Atlanta, and Matt Cassel of New England. He suggests that their performance has been improving as the 2008 season has moved on. and shows their performance, graphically illustrating it in the following manner. He uses a measure, "Adjusted YPA" or, Adjusted Yards per Attempt, defined as [Yards -40*Interceptions + 10*Touchdowns]/Attempt, and then looks at their 4-week moving average to compare the three quarterbacks.
Well, I decided to look myself. I have been "casually observing" that Flacco and Ryan have been having some "pretty decent" games recently (Ryan is on my Fantasy team). So, I decided to put my newly developed CMI to the test.
Here's what it shows:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0abcf/0abcfd03e3e2001d0b203aa397f66c65c4d706a9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e31c/9e31cea48452783622e7211501836e0b69423558" alt=""
QB Wins Added = [(Air Yards - Sack Yards) * 1.56 - INTs * 50.5]/Pass Attempts - 3
where, (Air Yards - Sack Yards) is substituted for Completions. In other words, he also takes out Touchdowns thrown and Yards per Attempt. Brian is the first person I know of that does not include touchdowns as a part of a passer rating calculation, and he is to be commended for that. My only real issue with Brian's calculation is that YAC, or, Yards After Catch, is not a readily available statistic, and hence, "Air Yards" is not easily calculated.
I am still developing CMI, and the next (enhanced) version will incorporate sacks. Given that one of my goals is also to look back in time and be able to compare QBs over time, I will only be able to that back to 1969.
As I mentioned at the top, Brian is a very smart guy, and has done some very good work on a whole host of topics relating to the NFL, with particular attention to statistical rigor. I will be referring to his site quite a bit in future postings.
No comments:
Post a Comment